After the controversial words of Bernardo Ditgesfounder of the Club Náutico Arsenal de Zárate, the sports entity disassociated itself and published a statement repudiating “all acts of violence”.
The man had declared in dialogue with radio with you that he is “very sorry for everything that happened, mainly for Fernando’s family, and very sad about everything that people are talking about. Most of what they say is lies. For example, that they are children of power because they are very humble families. It’s a pity that this has become so publicized “. He also revealed that he has a close relationship with the families of Maximo Thomsen, Ciro and Lucas Pertossi and Enzo Comelli.
The notice
The Board of Directors of the Arsenal de Zárate Yacht Club stated in the letter that “as an institution we are totally oblivious to the events that occurred in Villa Gesell and that it is not real that the 10 accused were members and practiced a sport in the club. Without naming them, they clarified that only three of the accused practiced sports at the club. They are Thomsen, Ciro and Lucas Pertossi, three of the most complicated by the murder of Fernando Báez Sosa.
The controversial account on social networks that defends rugbiers: “Enough of social condemnation”
“The club like good institution It makes it known that nothing that some people mention, whether in the media or on social networks, is related or endorsed by the CNAZ,” he added.
Lastly, and after sending condolences to Fernando’s family and to the people “who are going through one of the most difficult moments of their lives,” the sports institution stated in the message, in capital letters and in bold, that “our institution rejects, repudiates, emphatically and definitively condemns all acts of violence”.
Leaders of the Zárate Rugby club: “It was an accident and the sentence must be from the court, not from society”
In the last few hours, while the trial continues against the eight accused of beating to death Fernando Baez Sosa At the exit of a bowling alley in Villa Gesell, the position of the leaders of the rugby club in which some of the defendants played was known, and their statements generated a strong controversy because they considered that “they are not murderers“, Que “It was an accidentand they repudiated the “social condemnation”.
“It was an accident”
Yes ok marcelo urraclub attorney and attorney acknowledge guilt of those who killed the 18-year-old, understands that it was “a fatality, they did not look for it, He passed. I believe that if you are fighting, you are not thinking of killing people.”
Representative of the Zárate rugby club: “It was common for them to hit one of several”
Similar is the definition you gave Bernardo Ditgesfounder of Náutico Arsenal Zárate Rugby, in dialogue with radio with you:”It was an accident. To say that a group went to kill is total nonsense“. And he added that “they did not go out to attack, they are not dogs.”
Social and media condemnation
Both also focused on “media pressure” and “social condemnation.” “I agree that I have to condemn the guilty but Any trial has to be condemned by the judge, the witnesses and not by the media sideDitges said.
“I am very sorry for what happened, mainly for Fernando’s family, I respect that. And it makes me very sad that many people are speaking with lies, saying that they are children of power, when they are very humble families. Too bad this got so publicized“, he added.
Trial by Báez Sosa: experts explain how they identified the rugby players through videos
For her part, Urra repudiated the social condemnation in dialogue with Chronicle: “It is totally logical. If they could hang them from the Plaza de Zárate they would hang them, but that is not the case, because that is what Justice is for. Nobody goes to a disco, like the brique, thinking that they are going to kill people. So you don’t have to remove the fact from the environment in which it happened. You have to look at the specific fact, and This trial has already started with a society condemning everyone“.
The defendants’ parents are “great people” and “not powerful”
Urra, who knows some of the defendants’ relatives, assured that “the few people I know are correct and kind,” and denied that “they are powerful people.” “they are common families“, said.
“Why don’t the parents of the rubgiers communicate with the family of Fernando Báez Sosa?”, In response to this query that the journalist Gustavo Grabia made to Ditges, the response was that “if they communicated, they were attacked, if they don’t do the same, they are attacked. I know the parents, they are excellent people“.
JP/MCP
You may also like
