The political leader eduardo duhalde, asserted that “we must rearm and make a serious justicialismo.” The proposals for the PJ to once again take preponderance, in Fontevecchia modefor net tv Y RadioProfile (FM 101.9). In addition, the judicial conflict with the highest court.
I would like you to present your proposal for the province of Buenos Aires.
I always led the justicialismo of Buenos Aires and, every time he took a position, he resigned. I am one of those who understands that when he is a governor or president, it is no longer because of a party. I did the same thing when I became president, and that’s when I resigned as the party’s president because the leaders don’t understand that you are no longer part of a party when you are president.
Now it’s a disaster, the friends of Cristina Kirchner with the rest. You have to rearm and do a serious justicialism, which has to follow an ideology from production and work, which was the obsession of the founder of the party. But it seems that nobody realized that and presidents emerged who did not focus on production, except me, who have those same ideas.
Duhalde challenges Máximo Kirchner and wants to lead the Buenos Aires PJ: “Peronism has been usurped”
Justicialismo has many things of Juan Domingo Peron which are already old, but the issue of production and work is simply what all European countries came up with after situations as difficult as ours.
In 2002, he had to initiate the request for impeachment to the Court of Carlos Menem. How was that? What are the differences between that and the current process?
What I know is that when I became president, what I asked of alfonsin It was that the ministers who took office had a strong relationship with Parliament, because they wanted to do 2 to 1 to Justice.
Vanesa Siley: “The impeachment request to the Supreme Court is historic”
Do you find in today any point of comparison with co-participation or not?
It may be one of the thousands of mistakes I made, I don’t remember. Leaders have constant mistakes. What I can tell you on my part is that it was never in bad faith.
Today’s topic is clear. The Government is making a serious mistakebecause it is entertainment.
BL J L
You may also like
