Delia Ferreira Rubio assured this Thursday that “The Nation should repeat the experience of Córdoba with the single paper ticket” and what so “This negotiation of the political parties would come to an end”.
“They have discovered that through the contribution by ballotwhich is a contribution that is established in the political financing law, they can do a business even when their mother and sister are going to vote for them as the only voters,” said the head of Transparency International.
“All the parties receive based on the fact that they have presented candidacies. That is why the contribution at the country level for all categories is estimated at 8 billion pesos, ”he added in statements to miter cordoba.
“That as long as there are not some alive who follow a path that the Court enabled in the year 2020, after a case that began in the year 2015, which established that in reality the sum for the Paso should not be given to the parties that compete for the election, but to each of the lists that the parties present“, accurate.
He also stated that “the National Electoral Chamber will try to ensure that the money given for printing ballots is for printing ballots.”
“What happens to these extremely small parties, which are a rubber stamp just for the purpose of collecting this. They don’t spend this on ticket printing because they obviously know they don’t need those tickets on the tables,” added the head of Transparency International. “The money ends up being supposedly used in the campaign in the best of cases”opined.
Cordova
For Ferreira Rubio, “The best thing would be to go to a single paper ticket, where it is guaranteed that there are all the options as we Cordoba have seen for many years and it has worked perfectly”. “The ballots are printed by the State, they are on the table, we give one to each voter”, strange about the system that governs Córdoba.
He also argued that “every reform of the electoral law and of the party financing law has tried to close some of these windows of opportunity for business.”
Antecedent
When asked about the funds that the political forces received by tranche for the printing of ballots, she replied: “This has been a consequence, I believe, of the Supreme Court ruling that said ‘let’s give the money for each list and not for each party'”.
“We have made progress in transparency. We have advanced in some limits, but the problem is not solved and on the other hand it is also impossible to think of electoral campaigns without expenses, ”she concluded.
