Sanae Takaichi, Japan’s inaugural female prime minister, is navigating a diplomatic crisis as friction between Tokyo and Beijing intensifies regarding Taiwan. What commenced as a reserved exchange of greetings has rapidly escalated into one of the most acute standoffs between the two Asian nations in recent memory.
Escalating friction between Tokyo and Beijing
Just a month into her tenure, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is embroiled in a significant global disagreement. Merely days following her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the relationship between Japan and China has sharply declined, exacerbated by strong language and nationalistic passion. The immediate origin of this discord arises from Takaichi’s statements concerning Taiwan, which Beijing considers a fundamental national concern and an integral component of its land.
During a legislative assembly on November 7, Takaichi declared that any potential Chinese aggression against Taiwan—situated a brief distance from Japanese territory—would be regarded as “a situation jeopardizing Japan’s existence.” Her remarks indicated that such an occurrence might trigger a defensive military reaction from Tokyo. This change represented a significant deviation from earlier Japanese governments, which had historically refrained from suggesting direct military participation in Taiwan’s protection.
Beijing reacted with fury, denouncing Takaichi’s remarks as a grave interference in China’s internal affairs. The response was not limited to diplomatic statements. Xue Jian, the Chinese consul general in Osaka, published a post on X (formerly Twitter) declaring, “The dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The post, quickly deleted, was condemned by Tokyo as “extremely inappropriate,” while Taiwan described it as a direct threat.
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs came to Xue’s defense, stating that his remarks were a response to Japan’s “perilous and mistaken” declarations. Authorities accused Tokyo of eroding China’s sovereign rights and cautioned that the matter of Taiwan constitutes an unyielding boundary.
The reverberations of “wolf warrior” diplomacy
The incident has brought back recollections of China’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy, an assertive foreign policy approach that rose to prominence in the early 2020s. During that period, Chinese diplomats frequently utilized social media platforms to directly challenge detractors, occasionally employing provocative language. While Beijing had recently attempted to moderate this strategy to restore confidence with Western countries, the current dispute suggests a potential reversion to that confrontational stance.
Within China, nationalist voices and state media outlets have amplified public outrage against Japan. The People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, described Takaichi as “reckless” and warned that “crossing the line on Taiwan will come with a price.” An account associated with China’s state broadcaster mocked her, asking, “Has her head been kicked by a donkey?” Meanwhile, Hu Xijin, a prominent commentator and former editor of the Global Times, escalated the rhetoric further, writing that China’s “battle blade for beheading invaders has been sharpened” and suggesting Japan would face destruction if it intervened in the Taiwan Strait.
Takaichi has since tried to downplay the situation, clarifying that her statements were hypothetical and not intended as a policy declaration. Yet her position remains precarious. Japan depends heavily on China as its largest trading partner, even as it grows increasingly wary of Beijing’s military expansion in the East and South China Seas. Balancing national security concerns with economic interdependence has become one of Takaichi’s greatest challenges.
A nuanced diplomatic equilibrium
Takaichi’s methodology mirrors her enduring conservative perspective on national security. As a protégé of the late former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, she has championed a more robust military stance and enhanced collaboration with the United States and its regional partners. Initial declarations from her administration concerning Taiwan, alongside her engagement with the island’s delegates at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, indicated a sustained progression in Japan’s move towards a more confident foreign policy.
During her late October meeting with Xi Jinping in South Korea, Takaichi underscored the significance of a “strategic, mutually beneficial relationship.” Nevertheless, she also voiced apprehension regarding China’s military exercises close to contested islands in the East China Sea—a region both countries assert ownership over. That conversation, while appearing amicable at the time, hinted at the more profound discord now emerging.
The current diplomatic clash comes at a particularly sensitive moment. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II—a conflict that continues to shape Chinese and Japanese national identities. Beijing commemorated the event with a massive military parade, showcasing its armed forces and reaffirming its historical narrative of resistance against Japanese aggression.
In the lead-up to the anniversary, Chinese officials accused Japan of minimizing its wartime atrocities, while state media released several films depicting Japanese soldiers’ brutality during the war, including dramatizations of the Nanjing Massacre. The Japanese embassy in Beijing even advised its citizens to speak discreetly in public, fearing potential hostility amid rising nationalist fervor.
Taiwan’s historical legacy
The deep-seated antagonism between these two countries predates the Second World War, being intricately linked to Taiwan’s own convoluted past. Having been a Japanese colony since its transfer from Imperial China in the late 1800s, Taiwan stayed under Japanese dominion until Tokyo’s surrender in 1945. Subsequently, the Nationalist government of China assumed authority over the island, only to withdraw there after their defeat by the Communists in the civil conflict of 1949.
Since that time, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has viewed Taiwan as a renegade territory slated for eventual reintegration. From Beijing’s standpoint, the end of World War II signified the island’s “emancipation” from Japanese rule—a story deeply embedded in the country’s political self-perception. Chinese authorities frequently reference this historical context to bolster their sovereignty assertions and legitimize their resistance to external interference in matters concerning Taiwan.
When asked about Takaichi’s remarks, Chen Binhua, the spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, invoked this common history, stating that Japan carries a “historical burden” for its colonial governance of Taiwan. He proclaimed that China had “reclaimed” the island eight decades prior and cautioned that any endeavor to impede reunification would encounter resolute opposition.
The uncertain path ahead
The ongoing diplomatic predicament underscores the persistent instability within East Asian geopolitics. Japan’s expanding security collaboration with the United States and its augmented defense expenditures have already attracted Beijing’s close attention. Presently, with Takaichi at the helm, Tokyo seems prepared to embrace a more assertive position on regional security matters, especially concerning the stability of Taiwan.
For China, this matter goes beyond simple diplomacy; it delves into the core of national identity and sovereign rights. Consequently, even the mere hypothetical mention of Japanese military participation in Taiwan is viewed as an outright act of provocation.
While both administrations might eventually aim to reduce friction, this event highlights the delicate equilibrium that persists between two of Asia’s most formidable countries. Every miscalculation carries the potential to rekindle past animosities that never completely vanished over time.
In this atmosphere of mistrust and historical resentment, every word carries weight. For Takaichi, whose tenure has barely begun, the challenge lies in navigating Japan’s role between deterrence and diplomacy—maintaining peace while standing firm on national interests. Whether she can achieve that balance without deepening the rift with China will likely define not only her leadership but also the trajectory of East Asian relations in the years to come.
